In this topic I'm going to talk about two arguments. There are people say that should pay for full cost of their studies rather than being given free higher education, here in HCT we do not have to pay except what we pay for laptops.
Firstly, the people who agree with paying for higher education, actually there is no many ideas to support this argue. However, people support their view because every where people should pay for education even for school. They think people should pay because they will work hard and study hard in college also they support college to develop their resource and education when they pay also it can help in the payment for the staff salaries.
The second argue is a person have not pay for education because maybe there are not many people going to learn in high education. However, those people believe the reason why the education is free, because the government wants to support people to learn and to give them some help. Also they need educated people in this country.
Overall, here you can found free college and not free college so you can chose between colleges even schools. What do you think is better you can chose it up to you. But I think the second argue is better because we educated people and if you change every things to private it may cause reducing in the number for students in higher educations.
Monday, 17 May 2010
Argument Essay (Education )
The Visitor to Canada (1996-2006 )
This line graph illustrates the number of visitors over 10 years from two countries Japan and Spain to Canada between the years 1996 to 2006.
The number of Japanese visitors was highest in 1996 to 1999 at more than 800 thousand visitors. The number of Spanish visitors was sharply increased from about 300 thousand in 1996 to about 650 thousand visitors in 1999. But after 1999 the number of visitors from both countries changed, in 2001 the Japanese visitors were reduced to 800 thousand visitors and the number of Spain visitors greatly decreased to about 500 thousand visitors. In the last five years the number or visitors from Japan to Canada started to go up and in 2006 was about 630 thousand visitors and the number of Spanish visitors greatly dropped and in 2006 it reached less than 600 thousand visitors.
In conclusion, the number of Japanese visitors outnumbered the Spanish visitors during the ten-year period.
Argument Essay (Examination in the HCT )
Examinations make students nervous, they feel stressed about taking the exams which make them lose marks and do not do well. It’s also unfair way to assess knowledge considering that the exams for all the year are in one or two week each exam follow the other day by day, That’s why student feel nervous, this is why most of the people want home work and the all year work counted to pass the year this is the way to assess student progress because it’s better to do things counted as marks to pass when you are not under pressure. Most of the people who agree that say this will affect all the career life for the students in the future.
On another hand teachers and professors believe that exams are a good incentive for students to study and review course materials. For those who say that’s its unfair for students to be asses by examination, they reply: the tests are fair assessments because the same exam is taken by all the students and it helps the student to know what they understand and do not understand of the course content”.
In conclusion, almost all of the schools and even colleges and universities are using examinations as a way to assess students. In my opinion examinations are better because it will keep you under pressure only during the exams time but if the assess are all year that means you will be under pressure
all the year
Monday, 26 April 2010
USA Number of Farms and All Farm Workers 1910-2000
The graph shows the comparison between the number of farms and a farm workers in 1910 – 2000 in the U.S.
The biggest change was between 1950 – 2000 with workers , which fall sharply starting fifty years ago. The second major change was in the workers. The number slightly decreased for twenty years from 1950 to 1970. The third change was in form worker numbers which declined sharply two years ago. In contrast, the number of farms steadily during the first forty – years period. In the next forty – years the numbers of farms slightly decreased. The farm numbers are expected to fall sharply. After recent fall, numbers had decreased steadily for forty – years. By the end of the period, the farm number stayed stable forty – years.
In conclusion, the overall the trend shows a decline in both numbers in farms and farms workers in the 20th century in the U.S
Tuesday, 13 April 2010
Changes in Milk Consumption in USA (1950 – 2000)
The biggest change was the dramatic drop in total milk consumption. It fell from about 130 liters per person in 1950 to only around 90 liters five decades later. The second major was in the type of milk drunk. At the beginning, whole milk was more popular at 120 liters, but it fell sharply to about a quarter that by 2000. In contrast, the amount of low fat milk consumed shot up. It rose from roughly 10 liters in 1950 to five times that in 1980, when consumption was almost tied with whole milk.
In conclusion, the American diet with regard to dairy changes significantly over the time represented. Total consumption decreases but low-fat finally outranks whole milk. still have to be with
Sunday, 11 April 2010
Argument Essay
of animals undergo painful death as a result of scientific research? While most people think animal testing is necessary, others are upset by what they see as needless suffering. This essay outlines some of the arguments for and against animal testing.
First, let’s look at the advantages. One very positive point is that many medical treatments and procedures have been developed from such experiments. Since animals share many features with humans, scientists use animals to test the safety and effectiveness of newly developed drugs. Moreover, there is a large supply of animals. Some, such as mice and rats, have many babies, and there is no danger of extinction for these species. Finally some advocates think that animals are less valuable than people. If there is a mistake, it will not cost a human life.
However there are also a number of arguments against animal testing. Perhaps the most important is that animals may be suffering unnecessarily. Critics do not believe that every new drug needs to be tested on animals. Furthermore, some feel animal testing is ineffective; they point out that many drugs still have to be withdrawn from the market despite extensive testing. Last, some campaigners would like to see alternative used. They feel more humane testing is possible and, too, that we could rely more on organ donors.
To conclude, we need to ensure that animals used for experimental purposes do not suffer much pain. Although some animal testing may be unavoidable at present, treating our fellow creatures mercifully will demonstrate our humanity.ch? While most people think animal testing is necessary, others are